On his blog, Dave Comier (2017) shares his opportunity to create sustainable technology that supports K-12 education. He addresses the concern around digital citizenship and the Delma many educators face around using new innovative technologies while managing the hidden upsells of these new technologies. As a K-12 educator, I examined the different lenses I would need to consider before introducing change in the current technology. I wonder how the legalities of introducing new technologies that do not align with current school or district policies around technology will be approached? Can the policies be changed to include new technology if the technology has the potential to benefit students learning? Will exceptions be made, or will we forever use the same policies despite introducing new technology? How do we measure the risk and the reward of introducing new technology? What are teachers supposed to do when some students have consent and permission while others do not? It is bound to happen. Some students are allowed to use the technology while others will not be. Are we going to ask our teachers to provide another layer of differentiation for students who can not use the same technology as their peers? Dave Cormier identifies building trust as an important lesson he learned through his project. I agree with Dave Cormier that successful change in the use of technology lies in the trust of the teachers that use it. As Dave highlighted, this is not the first revolution around education. Some innovations have worked, and others have not. Building trust with the teachers who will be innovating with the new technology is crucial.
Reference
Cormier, D. (2017, December 8). Our schools aren’t broken, they’re hard. Daves Educational Blog. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2017/12/08/our-schools-arent-broken-theyre-hard/